Post-Modernism
Post-modernism is closely related with constructivism and is
development of constructivism. It is complicated term or set of ideas, one that
has only emerged as an area of academic study since the mid 1980s. The term
post-modernism is hard to define because it is a concept that appears in a wide
variety of discipline pr areas of study, including art, architecture, music,
film, literature, sociology, communications, fashion and technology. It is hard
to locate it temporally or historically, because it’s not clear exactly when
postmodernism begins. Perhaps the easiest way to start thinking about
postmodernism is by thinking about modernism, the movement from which
postmodernism seems to grow or emerge.
Modernism has modes
of definition, both of which are relevant to understanding postmodernism. It came
from the aesthetic movement broadly labeled “modernism”. This movement in
visual arts, music, literature, and drama, which rejected the old Victorian
standards of how art should be made, consumed and what it should mean.
There are lots of
questions to be asked about post-modernism, one of the most important is about
the politics involved or more simply, is this movement toward fragmentation,
provisionally, performance and instability something good or something bad?
On another level, However, Postmodernism seems to offer
some alternatives to joining the global culture of consumption, where
commodities and forms of knowledge are offered by forces far beyond any
individual’s control. These alternatives focus on thinking of all action as
necessarily local, limited and partial but nonetheless effective.
Post-modernism politics offers a way to theorize local situations as fluid and
unpredictable, though influenced by global trends. Hence, the motto might well
be ‘think globally, act locally’ and don’t worry about any grand scheme or
master plan.
Characteristics
The characteristics of the
post-modernism are:-
a.
Study or comprehension
In fact knowledge is knitted in the text for Postmodernist. If any
text is studied without its formation, there is no stability in meaning. The
possibility of meaning is within the text that the reader will try to fulfill
it and that will not be competed in a single effort. The text will be polluted
with different effort. That means language or text is polluted and impure.
According postmodernists every text will have certain meaning link that should
be interrelated with each other. Each sentence is linked with each other in
which knowledge is knitted. After reading, the comprehending of the text won’t
be different.
b.
Structuralism
According to post-modernism no knowledge is final and true. Every
knowledge can be construct knowledge that can be embedded or destructed and
that is not absolute and final as well. A set of idea is of one structure
similarly another set will have another structure. Every knowledge can give
birth to know language.
c.
Knowledge or power
Postmodernists think that knowledge is power. The source of
knowledge and its authenticity is researched and validated. There will be no
sex discrimination and everybody will be treated as one or whole human being.
The order should make as male and female, eastern and western, sane and insane.
These all will be possible only through the knowledge.
d.
Certainty
Post modernists say that there will be no universality. Therefore,
the small ethnic and cultural elements will be studied and diversity will be
accepted in postmodernism. Instead of great hypothesis and principles, small
diversified and contemporary power will be taken care of academic exercises. It
gives importance to fragmentation and brings conflict among the ideology. It
does not take into consideration of disorders and hierarchy.
Modernism is the coincident of the reaction and
dissatisfaction of the postmodernism. Both are combined together but they have
their own identity. In fact, Modernism is the main root whereas post-modernism
developed upon it. For example”- “Fawn” as newly born fawn has its own
existence but can not leave its mother until “bread feeding”.
Phases
The first phase is associated with particular technological
developments, namely the steam-driven motor and with a particular kind of
aesthetics, namely, realism. The second phase occurred from the late nineteenth
century until the mid-twentieth century. In this phase, monopoly capitalism is
associate with electric and internal combustion motors, and with modernism.
The third
phase is where we are now and is multinational or consumer capitalism with
emphasis placed on marketing, selling and consuming commodities, not on
producing them that is associated with nuclear and electronic technologies and
correlated with postmodernism.
Postmodern
Educational Concepts
Constructivism is the main underlying learning theory in postmodern
education. The basic idea is that all knowledge is invented or ‘constructed’ in
the minds of people. Knowledge is not discovered, as modernists would claim. In
other words, the ideas teachers teach and students learn do not correspond to
“Reality”, they are merely human constructions. People create knowledge, ideas
and language not because they are “true’, but they are useful. Therefore, reality is story. All reality
exists, not objectively. Nobody’s version of reality can claim to have more
authority that is objective because all versions are merely human creations.
“Another major
feature of this tentative, relativist and instrumentalists (pragmatic) concept
of knowledge is the equal worth of knowledge constructed by the learner, the
teachers, or the scientists”. If no one’s knowledge is necessarily true,
everything changes. Now the question of what counts as “knowledge” to be taught
in the schools is not a matter of objective evidence or arguments, but rather a
matter of power. Those who have the power can make sure their constructs are
the ones that dominate the curriculum, while other opposing viewpoints are at
least partially suppressed, ignored or “marginalized”.
Teachers in postmodernism
Since the focus of the classroom, in postmodernism education,
becomes the student’s construction of knowledge, they shift away from a
teacher-centered classroom to a more student-centered environment. “Rather than
identifying the set of skills to be a got in children’s heads, attention shifts
to establishing learning environments and science in social settings.”
The student-centered classroom in this context is likely
to have minimal structure. It usually involves opportunities for social
interaction, independent investigations and study, and the expression of
creativity, as well as provision for different learning styles. There students
create knowledge and are no longer forced to bow to the suppression of
traditional objective “knowledge”. “The teacher would come to realize that what
he or she presents as a “problem’ may be seen differently by the students.
Consequently, the students may produce a sensible solution that makes no sense
to the teacher. To be told that it is wrong is unhelpful and inhibiting or
hamper because it disregards the effort the students put in.
At least under postmodern
theory we are not guilty of an even worse crime according to postmodernism
scholar, Johnella Butler, who warns, “The colonization of minds is
characteristic of American education.” In order words, when dominant culture
calls on minorities to speak classroom English, do math, history and science
the white man’s way, they have acted in the old colonial role, just like
earlier European who believed it was their responsibility to colonize non-white
cultures and lands imposing European standards dress, religion and language on
those cultures.
Characteristics of
Modernism
Modernism gives emphasis on impressionism and subjectively in
writing an emphasis on how seeing
takes place, rather than what is perceived. It emphasizes on fragmented forms,
discontinuous narratives, and random-seeming collages. A tendency toward
reflexivity, or self-consciousness, about production of the work of art, so
that each piece calls attention to its own status as a production, as something
constructed and consumed in particular ways.
A rejection of
elaborate formal aesthetics in favor of minimalist designs and a rejection of
the distinction between “high” and “low” or popular culture, both in choice of
materials used to produce art and in methods of displaying, distributing, and
consuming art. Postmodernism, like modernism, follows most of these same ideas,
rejecting boundaries between high and low forms of art, rejecting rigid genre
distinctions, emphasizing pastiche, parody, irony and playfulness.
No comments:
Post a Comment